HOMEABOUT THE DAPEOPLE & LEADERSHIPPOLICIES NEWSSPEECHESCAMPAIGNSDOCUMENTS



 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


  Discussion Documents   »   Making The Expanded Public Works Programme Work
   
 


Making The Expanded Public Works Programme Work:

Summary

The Expanded public works programme (EPWP) is hailed as an important Government intervention to grow the economy, alleviate poverty and to eliminate unemployment. Now, almost two years since its September 2004 inception, the Democratic Alliance believes that the time has come to assess the implementation of the EPWP and look at how Government is doing in achieving the goals of the programme.

The Democratic Alliance has compiled a set of ten criteria by which to assess Government's implementation of the Expanded Public Works Programme. The DA plans to use the criteria as a basis upon which to:
  • visit and assess the implementation of various EPWP projects; and,


  • assess the implementation and outcomes of the programmes right up to its envisioned completion in 2009.
An initial analysis of the implementation of the EPWP according to each of these criteria has already revealed a number of problems. Along with the 10 implementation criteria and problems identified for each of these criteria, the comprehensive part of this document also includes proposed policy solutions for each of the problems identified, as well as a five-step action plan for the implementation of these solutions.

The ten criteria read as follows:
  1. Participant recruitment and application procedures need to be fair, equitable, well-targeted, well-defined, simple, easily practicable and transparent.


  2. Remuneration must be set at levels that would appeal mostly to the target population, but, on its own, should not be seen or utilised as a self-selection mechanism sufficient to draw only the poorest into the EPWP.


  3. Remuneration must be structured with a productive work ethic and income security in mind.


  4. The specification of every work opportunity and the workload of every participant must aligned with the outcomes envisioned for the programme; and, planned for, co-ordinated and managed individually and per programme project.


  5. Programme participation needs to be based on the actual demand for labour and used to plan, co-ordinate and manage work opportunities in an integrated manner.


  6. Planned or need-based infrastructure projects should be reprioritised for the purposes of the labour-intensive PWP as far as is possible.


  7. The level and type of exposure to training and work experience for each participant need to be predetermined and planned in accordance with supply-side constraints and in recognition of demand-side criteria.


  8. On exit from the programme, each participant should be made aware of how they have been advantaged by their engagement in the EPWP and how to translate this into improved future engagement with the labour market.


  9. On exit from the programme, each participant should be provided with credible documents detailing their participation in the EPWP.


  10. The programme should be evaluated in terms of its pre-determined inputs, outputs and outcomes.
The analysis contained in the comprehensive part of this document determined that, in order for the EPWP to live up to its envisioned outcomes, Government needs to take the following five actions steps:

STEP 1: The entire programme should be properly alligned from concept, through implementation, its impact on the lives of its participants, its envisioned outcomes, right through to post-programme review.

STEP 2: The central planning and support capacity of the EPWP unit should be expanded so that it can ensure the quality of the programme, as well as manage its full life-cycle implementation properly.

STEP 3: The concept implementation of the EPWP needs to be adapted to local conditions so as to ensure the necessary focus on envisioned impacts and outcomes; and, to ensure that only the targeted population is drawn into the programme.

STEP 4: The cause and requirements of the EPWP need to be integrated into the planning of each and every Government Department.

STEP 5: The monitoring and evaluation of the EPWP needs to be completely reviewed so that it yields management information for the full-lifecycle of the programme as well as clear yardsticks for the progress of the progamme in terms of its envisioned outcomes.

The DA's campaign will continue to identify weak areas in the implementation of the EPWP, and continue advancing solutions in how to ensure its successful conclusion.

Download full document (EPWP.doc)


www.pilotfish.co.za 
Management »
Vision and Values »
Principles »
Nomination Regulations »
Code of Conduct for Public Representatives »
DA Youth »
DA Women's Network »
Federal Constitution »
Democratic Alliance National Leadership »
Parliament (Spokespeople & Leaders of special task groups) »
Provincial Legislators »
Local Government (Councillors and Caucus Leaders of the Unicities) »
Accountability.com 2007 »
Accountability.com 2006 »
The PetroSA documents »
The Firearms control act »
Everything you need to know about applying for your Old Age Pension »
Stop the Mugabe Loan »
Save Pretoria »
Our Cops Deserve Better »
The DA's Guide to SMME »
Basic Income Grant »
Municipal Election Campaign 2006 »
Election Campaign 2004 »
The Power of Learning »
The right to a Basic Education »
Audit Outcomes »
« DA performance audit
« Budget Votes
« Discussion Documents
« Position Papers
« Manifestos
« Federal Constitution
« Archives
« Cabinet Report Card for 2007
« Cabinet Report Card for 2006
« Cabinet Report Card for 2005
« Ministerial Report Card 2004
« Giving Victims Their Rights: The Da's Position Paper On Victims Of Crime
« ASGISA: improving planning and implementation
« Short-Changing the Children: A DA analysis of Auditor-General’s reports of the 9 provincial education departments
« Skills and Vacancies: DA outlines problems and proposes solutions
« Government’s compliance with the Promotion of Access to Information Act: Access Denied
« 5 Proposals to Make ASGISA Work
« Getting Government On-line back on track
« What you can and can’t say in South Africa
« Helping Small Business: Dealing with skills and unemployment
« Helping Small Business: The One-Stop Shop
« Cutting the red tape to small business
« Making The Expanded Public Works Programme Work
« South Africa’s top 12 aids dissidents
« South Africa’s five worst hospitals
« The Dirty Linen of SA’s State Hospitals
« South Africa’s 5 worst Municipalities
« The arms deal – more unanswered questions
« Giving Parliament back it's teeth
« Two Visions For South Africa
« The DA’s judicial review
« The DA’s six-point-plan to improve the matric pass rate
« DA's plans to force gov to resolve problems in commission for occupational injuries
« Land reform and the willing buyer, willing seller principle
« Busting the ASGI constraints
« SA's Betrayed Children
« Hanging by a Thread
« The DA and the Freedom Charter
« The 5 Doors: A Review Of The Criminal Justice System
« Local Government Election Manifesto 2006
« Local Government Election Manifesto 2004
« The DA's Alternative Budget for 2006
« The DA's Alternative Budget for 2005
« The DA's Alternative National Budget for 2004
« Budget Votes 2006-2007
« Budget Votes 2005